How it works

Your judgment, written down. Then applied, every time.

Twynit starts by capturing something no system has ever held: what a good candidate looks like, to you, for this search. Everything else — the reading, the ranking, the receipts, the compounding — follows from that one act.

01 — The standard

Describe the hire in plain English.

You write it the way you'd brief a colleague. Your Twin turns it into a scorecard — weighted priorities, must-haves, and the screening questions that will establish what a résumé can't. Every weight is visible and yours to change.

new search — your words become the scorecard

“Staff backend engineer. Strong Go and Postgres in production — payments experience is a real plus. I care more about ownership than years.”

Skills match35
Experience25
Qualitative fit25

+ 4 screening questions drafted — edit anything before it runs

02 — The approval

Nothing runs until you've approved the judgment.

A search is never live until you've signed off on how it judges — whether it was created by hand, imported from your ATS, or parsed from a job description. No candidate is ever evaluated by a standard you haven't seen.

activation — the gate every search passes
TueScorecard v1 approved by you
TueSearch went live — reading begins
TueRésumés that arrived early: held, then read

03 — The reading

Every candidate, read the same careful way.

The 400th application gets the same read as the first. Ranking and filtering are deterministic — rules and math against your scorecard, not vibes — and every verdict carries its evidence, cited to the line it came from.

When something can't be established, your Twin says so instead of guessing — and asks the candidate directly through screening.

match breakdown — every line cited
Go — 4 yrs in production, payments infra
Postgres — partitioned a 40M-row ledger
Ownership — established in screening

notice period: not determinable → added to screening

04 — The decision

You decide. It remembers why.

Every call you make lands in an immutable ledger — the decision, the evidence, the why. When you overrule your Twin, it asks what it missed, and your answer changes how it reads the next hundred candidates.

the record — decisions with their why
9:12Ananya Iyer → advance — remembered as decision #147
9:14You overruled on Devon Park — your Twin asked what it missed
9:15“Queue migrations count as distributed-systems depth” — noted

05 — The trust

Autonomy is earned, one action at a time.

Everything starts in Ask mode: your Twin previews the action and waits for your call. Approve the same action enough times, unchanged, and it offers to just do it — announcing each act with a receipt, reversible for 72 hours.

Undo once, and that action goes back to asking. Trust is granted by you, never assumed.

assistance — per search, per action
Screening invitesAnnounce — earned after 6 approvals
Stage updates to ATSAnnounce — earned after 5 approvals
Rejection emailsAsk — every one previewed

06 — The compounding

Outcomes close the loop.

Hires get outcome check-ins — two clicks at 30, 90, and 365 days. Outcomes become knowledge facts with evidence and sample sizes; knowledge proposes scorecard updates; you approve them, and the pipeline is re-read under the sharper standard.

That's the whole loop: every session creates progress today and makes the company smarter tomorrow.

memory — the loop, visible

Production incident ownership predicts success in your backend hires better than title seniority.

12 outcomes · 3 searcheshigh confidence

→ proposed scorecard update · awaiting your approval · v3 → v4

Write the standard once. Watch it get sharper for years.